At the time of signing the law, the procedure for its maintenance had not been established. On August 10, 2017, the federal portal of draft regulatory legal acts published for discussion a draft of the relevant government decree, according to which information on a person dismissed for loss of trust must, within 10 days of the adoption of such a decision, be entered in the register published in an open part of the state information system in the field of civil service in the information and telecommunications network "Internet." In this case, the register will include
Persons registered on the civil service portal, within 2 years from the date of entering the relevant data into the register will have access to information about the name of the dismissed official, details of the legal act on dismissal, the name of the body (organization) from which the person was dismissed due to loss of confidence, and the date of entering the information into the register.
According to the document, information on the presence or absence of an individual in the register and the above information about him or her will be available by filling in a form with information on his or her full name, date of birth, position held, TIN and SNILS.
The document does not provide for the provision of information contained in the register on the disciplinary sanction imposed on an employee for a corruption offense.
Information is kept in the register for two years, after which it is subject to deletion. Information on a person dismissed due to loss of confidence may also be deleted from the register if the act on the basis of which the information was entered therein is annulled, including by entry into force of the relevant court decision, or if the dismissed official dies.
Public disclosure of information on corrupt officials as a form of anti-corruption measures is used not only in Russia.
For example, in Chinain 2016, the database "Catching Tigers and Flies" (Catching Tigers and Flies), which contains infographics on high-ranking officials ("tigers") and low-ranking officials ("flies") who have been investigated, expelled from the party or convicted of corruption offenses since 2012. The resource allows tracking personal and economic ties of the persons involved in corruption cases, as well as classifying information about them on various grounds: by territory, by economic sector, by the level of the position held, etc. The resource allows tracking the personal and economic ties of the persons involved in corruption cases, as well as classifying information about them on various grounds: by territory, by economic sector, by the level of the position held, etc.
В Indiaon the website of theCentral Vigilance Commission ( CVC). CVCIn India, the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) website publishes lists of officials under investigation for corruption, including the date the investigation was launched, the name and position of the person under investigation, and the name of the authority in which the person holds office. In March 2017, the media reported a major technical glitch on the website, which began in November 2016 and resulted in the loss of all data on corrupt officials entered into the database prior to that date. The CVC denied this information, noting that the data was simply temporarily unavailable
In Kenya, the President of Kenya submits aList of Shame to Parliament, where officials are to be scrutinized for possible violations of anti-corruption laws.
The same practice of creating a list of persons suspected of corruption offenses or misuse of public office to be investigated also exists in Thailand. Thailand.
Minister of Public Service and Administration SOUTH AFRICAAs early as 2013, she advocated the creation of a separate anti-corruption agency and a centralized database of civil servants accused of misconduct. However, this idea has not been implemented.
В USAIn 2009, theDepartment of Justice, together with theInternational Association of Directors of Law Enforcement Standards and Training, jointly attempted to create a registry of police officers dismissed for various offenses, including corruption. Inclusion in the registry does not necessarily prohibit a dismissed police officer from applying for a position in government agencies again. Initially, by investing in his or her work, theDepartment of Justice and the International Association of Directors of Law Enforcement Standards and Training have created a registry of police officers dismissed for various offenses, including corruption.