Using the example of several states, we looked at how the popular vote can affect anti-corruption policy in a country.

Ireland has enacted the Criminalization of Corruption Act, which criminalizes bribery, trading in influence, use of official position, gift-giving, giving undue advantage and use of false documents.

Japanese law has been amended to allow persons accused or suspected of corruption to qualify for leniency by "denouncing" others.

India has introduced a number of amendments to anti-corruption legislation, including establishing liability for bribery, making legal entities liable for the misconduct of their employees, and defining conditions for exemption from liability for individuals and legal entities.

A number of amendments have been introduced to Russian legislation aimed at unifying anti-corruption norms, including those related to control over officials' expenses and providing for conditions for exempting legal entities from administrative liability for bribery.

Russia has approved the next National Anti-Corruption Plan for 2018-2020.

Ukraine has adopted a law on the establishment of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court and opened a thematic "corruption park".

Sri Lanka has passed a law providing for the establishment of a High Anti-Corruption Court.

In Argentina, relatives of top officials were banned from holding positions in the national public sector.

Especially for the anti-corruption portal, we have prepared an analytical report "Whistleblowing and Whistleblower Protection: Experience of the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada", dedicated to the topical issue of introducing procedures that allow officers and employees to report observed wrongdoing and providing protection for such persons.

Singapore has amended its criminal law to allow for the use of deferred prosecution agreements in the resolution of corruption offences.

China has established a system of anti-corruption bodies, including national and municipal supervisory commissions, which exercise the functions of investigating corruption offenses.

Using the example of several states, we looked at how the popular vote can affect anti-corruption policy in a country.

Ireland has enacted the Criminalization of Corruption Act, which criminalizes bribery, trading in influence, use of official position, gift-giving, giving undue advantage and use of false documents.

Japanese law has been amended to allow persons accused or suspected of corruption to qualify for leniency by "denouncing" others.

India has introduced a number of amendments to anti-corruption legislation, including establishing liability for bribery, making legal entities liable for the misconduct of their employees, and defining conditions for exemption from liability for individuals and legal entities.

A number of amendments have been introduced to Russian legislation aimed at unifying anti-corruption norms, including those related to control over officials' expenses and providing for conditions for exempting legal entities from administrative liability for bribery.

Russia has approved the next National Anti-Corruption Plan for 2018-2020.

Ukraine has adopted a law on the establishment of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court and opened a thematic "corruption park".

Sri Lanka has passed a law providing for the establishment of a High Anti-Corruption Court.

In Argentina, relatives of top officials were banned from holding positions in the national public sector.

Especially for the anti-corruption portal, we have prepared an analytical report "Whistleblowing and Whistleblower Protection: Experience of the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada", dedicated to the topical issue of introducing procedures that allow officers and employees to report observed wrongdoing and providing protection for such persons.

Singapore has amended its criminal law to allow for the use of deferred prosecution agreements in the resolution of corruption offences.

China has established a system of anti-corruption bodies, including national and municipal supervisory commissions, which exercise the functions of investigating corruption offenses.

Using the example of several states, we looked at how the popular vote can affect anti-corruption policy in a country.

Ireland has enacted the Criminalization of Corruption Act, which criminalizes bribery, trading in influence, use of official position, gift-giving, giving undue advantage and use of false documents.

Japanese law has been amended to allow persons accused or suspected of corruption to qualify for leniency by "denouncing" others.

India has introduced a number of amendments to anti-corruption legislation, including establishing liability for bribery, making legal entities liable for the misconduct of their employees, and defining conditions for exemption from liability for individuals and legal entities.

A number of amendments have been introduced to Russian legislation aimed at unifying anti-corruption norms, including those related to control over officials' expenses and providing for conditions for exempting legal entities from administrative liability for bribery.

Russia has approved the next National Anti-Corruption Plan for 2018-2020.

Ukraine has adopted a law on the establishment of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court and opened a thematic "corruption park".

Sri Lanka has passed a law providing for the establishment of a High Anti-Corruption Court.

In Argentina, relatives of top officials were banned from holding positions in the national public sector.

Especially for the anti-corruption portal, we have prepared an analytical report "Whistleblowing and Whistleblower Protection: Experience of the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada", dedicated to the topical issue of introducing procedures that allow officers and employees to report observed wrongdoing and providing protection for such persons.

Singapore has amended its criminal law to allow for the use of deferred prosecution agreements in the resolution of corruption offences.

China has established a system of anti-corruption bodies, including national and municipal supervisory commissions, which exercise the functions of investigating corruption offenses.